food-corpus-b-FROZEN-20260712-7c03…

Supposed to	N	Correct	Wrong	Unverified
▸ LOG — log the food	116	63 (54%)	53 (46%)	0 (0%)
53 handled wrong — click one to jump to its full detail below "I ate 2 slices sourdough toast with 14 grams butter." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 530 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 2 count of Toast (typical 160-260 kcal [per-serving]) "Breakfast was 45 grams dry rolled oats cooked with water." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add one large navel orange." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "For lunch I had 6 ounces grilled flank steak." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track a 9 ounce baked potato, plain." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Dinner was 5 ounces cod plus 160 grams roasted potatoes." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track 7 ounces rotisserie chicken, meat only." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "7 ounces rotisserie chicken meat only" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Chicken breast, Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted) "Record 100 grams cooked pasta with 125 grams marinara." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add 140 grams sweet potato mash." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add 1 cup canned corn drained." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add 1 cup beef chili." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log one cup split pea soup." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "I had 1 cup cooked couscous." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track 6 ounces tilapia with lemon, no oil." Reported could-not-confirm (write-confirmation false negative). "Record 45 grams pita chips." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "45 grams pita chips" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Potato Chips) "Add 5 ounces lamb chop, cooked weight." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log a Chobani Zero Sugar vanilla cup." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Record one Fairlife Core Power 26 gram vanilla shake." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 15 kcal is implausibly LOW for 1 count of Fairlife Core Power Elite Vanilla Protein Shake (typical 160-250 kcal [per-serving]) "Add a Starbucks grande flat white with whole milk." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track a Chipotle chicken bowl: white rice, black beans, mild salsa, cheese, lettuce." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log a McDonalds Egg McMuffin." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "I ate a Taco Bell bean burrito." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add a Premier Protein caramel shake." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track one Dave’s Killer Bread thin-sliced Good Seed slice." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log a Siggi’s strawberry skyr cup." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "I had a Panera Fuji apple salad with chicken, full size." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Record one Celsius peach vibe can." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add a Kodiak Cakes protein waffle, one waffle." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "Kodiak Cakes protein waffle" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Birthday Cake Power Waffles With Sprinkles, Waffle, Plain) "Track a Subway six inch turkey on wheat with provolone." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log one KIND dark chocolate nuts and sea salt bar." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "KIND dark chocolate nuts" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Dark chocolate, No Cow Chocolate Sea Salt Bar) "I ate a Trader Joe’s chicken tikka masala frozen meal." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add a Wendy’s small chili." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track one Clif Builder chocolate mint bar." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log a Sweetgreen harvest bowl." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "I had one Larabar apple pie bar." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 198 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 1 count of Apple Pie Fruit & Nut Bar (typical 60-130 kcal [per-serving]) "Record a Dunkin medium iced coffee: cream plus sugar." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add a Kirkland protein bar chocolate brownie." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track a Five Guys little cheeseburger." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log one Blue Diamond 100 calorie almond pack." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "I ate a Lean Cuisine herb roasted chicken meal." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Record one Gatorade Zero 20 ounce bottle." WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "Gatorade Zero 20 ounce bottle" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Gatorade Lemon Lime Thirst Quencher (8-20 Fluid Ounce) 160 Fluid Ounce 8 Pack Plastic Bottles) "Add a Shake Shack single ShackBurger." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track a Noosa lemon yogurt 8 ounce tub." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log a Costco rotisserie chicken breast serving, 6 ounces." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add a Nature Valley oats and honey two-bar pack." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track a Whole Foods salmon avocado roll." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log one PopCorners sea salt snack bag." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "I ate a Chick-fil-A grilled chicken sandwich." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Add a Banza chickpea pasta serving, 2 ounces dry." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Track one Halo Top vanilla bean pint, half the pint." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Log my turkey sandwich: two slices rye, 4 ounces turkey, one slice Swiss, mustard." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row). "Dinner bowl: 150 grams rice, 120 grams chicken, 80 grams avocado, salsa, 30 grams cheese." Reported could-not-confirm (write-confirmation false negative). "Track tacos: three corn tortillas, 5 ounces carne asada, onions, cilantro, and salsa verde." OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
Total	116	63 (54%)	53	0

PASSshould log the food"Log 170 grams plain nonfat Greek yogurt." (difficulty —)0.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Nonfat Greek yogurt, Nonfat Greek yogurt — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Nonfat Greek yogurt, Nonfat Greek yogurt — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 170 grams plain nonfat greek yogurt.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Nonfat Greek yogurt ×1 (170 g) 100 cal · 17.5g P · 6.1g C · 0.7g F
created food_log_entry: Nonfat Greek yogurt ×1 (170 g) 100 cal · 17.5g P · 6.1g C · 0.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:36:23.207Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I ate 2 slices sourdough toast with 14 grams butter." (difficulty —)0.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 530 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 2 count of Toast (typical 160-260 kcal [per-serving])

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 530 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 2 count of Toast (typical 160-260 kcal [per-serving])

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Toast and 14 grams butter. Assumed catalog default servings where you did not say an amount — tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Toast ×2 (100 g) 530 cal · 18g P · 98g C · 6.4g F
created food_log_entry: Butter ×1 (14 g) 100 cal · 0.1g P · 0g C · 11.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:36:34.723Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 3.5 ounces roasted turkey breast." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Turkey breast — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Turkey breast — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 3.5 ounces roasted turkey breast.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Turkey breast ×1 (3.5 oz) 134 cal · 28.8g P · 0g C · 1.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:36:45.990Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Breakfast was 45 grams dry rolled oats cooked with water." (difficulty —)2.9s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.9s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Dry oats? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:37:00.006Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add one large navel orange." (difficulty —)5.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Orange? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:37:16.489Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 220 grams cooked jasmine rice." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked jasmine rice — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked jasmine rice — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 220 grams cooked jasmine rice.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cooked jasmine rice ×1 (220 g) 286 cal · 5.3g P · 62g C · 0.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:37:27.792Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"For lunch I had 6 ounces grilled flank steak." (difficulty —)0.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I hear more than one saved version that could match "for lunch i had 6 ounces grilled flank steak". Which exact food and amount should I log?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:37:39.574Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Put down 85 grams avocado." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Avocado — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Avocado — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 85 grams avocado.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Avocado ×1 (85 g) 136 cal · 1.7g P · 7.2g C · 12.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:37:50.841Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I had a cup and a half of cooked lentils." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Lentils, Greek Yogurt Cup — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Lentils, Greek Yogurt Cup — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Greek Yogurt Cup and Lentils.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Greek Yogurt Cup ×1 (cup) 130 cal · 15g P · 12g C · 0g F
created food_log_entry: Lentils ×1 (half of cooked lentils) 58 cal · 4.5g P · 10.1g C · 0.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:38:02.524Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from user default.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 28 grams cheddar cheese." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cheddar cheese — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cheddar cheese — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 28 grams cheddar cheese.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cheddar cheese ×1 (28 g) 113 cal · 6.4g P · 1g C · 9.3g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:38:13.808Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add 12 baby carrots and 2 tablespoons hummus." (difficulty —)0.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Hummus, Baby carrots — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Hummus, Baby carrots — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 12 baby carrots and 2 tablespoons hummus.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Baby carrots ×1 (12 baby carrots) 42 cal · 0.7g P · 9.8g C · 0.1g F
created food_log_entry: Hummus ×1 (2 tbsp) 50 cal · 2.4g P · 4.3g C · 2.9g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:38:25.207Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track a 9 ounce baked potato, plain." (difficulty —)2.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I need to resolve plain before I log this meal. What should I use for plain?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:38:38.458Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Dinner was 5 ounces cod plus 160 grams roasted potatoes." (difficulty —)8.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 8.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Cod? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:38:57.959Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log one cup cooked quinoa." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked quinoa — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked quinoa — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged one cup cooked quinoa. Assumed 1 cup as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cooked quinoa ×1 (1 cup) 222 cal · 8.1g P · 39.4g C · 3.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:39:09.242Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add 2 cups romaine and 30 grams parmesan." (difficulty —)0.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Romaine lettuce, Parmesan cheese — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Romaine lettuce, Parmesan cheese — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 2 cups romaine and 30 grams parmesan.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Romaine lettuce ×1 (2 cup) 16 cal · 1.1g P · 3.1g C · 0.3g F
created food_log_entry: Parmesan cheese ×1 (30 g) 124 cal · 9g P · 2.5g C · 8.6g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:39:20.625Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I ate 150 grams blueberries." (difficulty —)0.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Blueberries — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Blueberries — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 150 grams blueberries.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Blueberries ×1 (150 g) 86 cal · 1g P · 21.8g C · 0.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:39:31.896Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record three scrambled eggs cooked with a teaspoon olive oil." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Egg, Olive oil — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Egg, Olive oil — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged three scrambled eggs cooked and a teaspoon olive oil. Assumed 1 tsp as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Egg ×1 (3 eggs) 215 cal · 18.9g P · 1g C · 14.3g F
created food_log_entry: Olive oil ×1 (1 tsp) 40 cal · 0g P · 0g C · 4.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:39:43.525Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track 7 ounces rotisserie chicken, meat only." (difficulty —)0.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "7 ounces rotisserie chicken meat only" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Chicken breast, Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted)

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "7 ounces rotisserie chicken meat only" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Chicken breast, Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted)

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Chicken breast and Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted. Assumed a typical serving of Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted while logging the rest of this meal. Tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Chicken breast ×1 (7 ounces (198.4 g)) 327 cal · 61.5g P · 0g C · 7.1g F
created food_log_entry: Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted ×1 (3 serving) 107 cal · 19.2g P · 0.9g C · 3.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:39:55.443Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Snack was 32 grams almonds." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Almonds — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Almonds — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 32 grams almonds.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Almonds ×1 (32 g) 185 cal · 6.8g P · 6.9g C · 16g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:40:06.725Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 250 milliliters whole milk." (difficulty —)0.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Whole milk — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Whole milk — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Whole milk.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Whole milk ×1 (100 g) 61 cal · 3.2g P · 4.8g C · 3.3g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:40:17.992Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I had 1 tablespoon peanut butter on a medium banana." (difficulty —)0.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Banana, Peanut butter, Banana — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Banana, Peanut butter, Banana — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 tablespoon peanut butter and a medium banana. Assumed 1 medium banana as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Peanut butter ×1 (1 tbsp) 88 cal · 3.8g P · 2.9g C · 7.6g F
created food_log_entry: Banana ×1 (1 medium banana) 105 cal · 1.3g P · 27.1g C · 0.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:40:42.493Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Record 100 grams cooked pasta with 125 grams marinara." (difficulty —)1.0s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.0s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I found Cooked pasta, but I also heard 125 marinara. Should I log those separately too?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:40:54.726Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add 4 ounces tofu and 2 cups broccoli." (difficulty —)0.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Broccoli, Firm tofu — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Broccoli, Firm tofu — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 4 ounces tofu and 2 cups broccoli.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Firm tofu ×1 (4 oz) 163 cal · 19.3g P · 3.2g C · 9.9g F
created food_log_entry: Broccoli ×1 (2 cup) 64 cal · 4.4g P · 13.1g C · 0.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:41:06.208Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 1 cup black beans drained." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Black beans — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Black beans — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup black beans drained.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Black beans ×1 (1 cup) 227 cal · 15.3g P · 40.8g C · 0.9g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:41:17.542Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Put down 60 grams granola." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Granola — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Granola — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 60 grams granola.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Granola ×1 (60 g) 283 cal · 6g P · 38.4g C · 12g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:41:28.898Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I ate 180 grams cottage cheese." (difficulty —)0.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cottage cheese — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cottage cheese — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 180 grams cottage cheese.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cottage cheese ×1 (180 g) 176 cal · 20g P · 6.1g C · 7.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:41:40.143Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log one medium pear and 18 grams walnuts." (difficulty —)0.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Walnuts, Pear — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Walnuts, Pear — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged one medium pear and 18 grams walnuts. Assumed 1 pear as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Pear ×1 (1 pear) 101 cal · 0.7g P · 27.1g C · 0.2g F
created food_log_entry: Walnuts ×1 (18 g) 118 cal · 2.7g P · 2.5g C · 11.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:41:51.560Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 2 ounces smoked salmon." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Smoked salmon — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Smoked salmon — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 2 ounces smoked salmon.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Smoked salmon ×1 (2 oz) 66 cal · 10.4g P · 0g C · 2.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:42:02.893Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add 1 cup cooked farro." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked farro — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked farro — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup cooked farro.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cooked farro ×1 (1 cup) 240 cal · 8.6g P · 50.7g C · 1.6g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:42:14.226Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 90 grams cucumber and 90 grams tomato." (difficulty —)0.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cucumber, Tomato — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cucumber, Tomato — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 90 grams cucumber and 90 grams tomato.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cucumber ×1 (90 g) 14 cal · 0.6g P · 3.2g C · 0.1g F
created food_log_entry: Tomato ×1 (90 g) 16 cal · 0.8g P · 3.5g C · 0.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:42:25.628Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 6 ounces pork tenderloin." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Pork tenderloin — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Pork tenderloin — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 6 ounces pork tenderloin.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Pork tenderloin ×1 (6 oz) 243 cal · 44.2g P · 0g C · 6g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:42:36.927Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 1 cup edamame shelled." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Edamame — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Edamame — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup edamame shelled.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Edamame ×1 (1 cup) 188 cal · 18.4g P · 13.8g C · 8.1g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:42:48.194Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add a small flour tortilla with 50 grams grilled chicken." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Chicken breast, Flour tortilla — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Chicken breast, Flour tortilla — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged a small flour tortilla and 50 grams grilled chicken. Assumed 1 flour tortilla as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Flour tortilla ×1 (1 flour tortilla) 140 cal · 3.8g P · 22.5g C · 3.6g F
created food_log_entry: Chicken breast ×1 (50 g) 83 cal · 15.5g P · 0g C · 1.8g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:42:59.829Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I had 40 grams raisins." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Raisins — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Raisins — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 40 grams raisins.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Raisins ×1 (40 g) 120 cal · 1.2g P · 31.7g C · 0.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:43:11.127Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 2 tablespoons chia seeds." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Chia seeds — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Chia seeds — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 2 tablespoons chia seeds.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Chia seeds ×1 (2 tbsp) 102 cal · 3.5g P · 8.8g C · 6.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:43:22.428Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 5 ounces shrimp cooked." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Shrimp — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Shrimp — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 5 ounces shrimp cooked.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Shrimp ×1 (5 oz) 140 cal · 34g P · 0.3g C · 0.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:43:33.760Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 1 cup unsweetened applesauce." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Unsweetened applesauce — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Unsweetened applesauce — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup unsweetened applesauce.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Unsweetened applesauce ×1 (1 cup) 102 cal · 0.5g P · 27.6g C · 0.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:43:45.062Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add 140 grams sweet potato mash." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Sweet potato? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:44:01.545Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I ate 25 grams dark chocolate." (difficulty —)0.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Dark chocolate, Dark chocolate — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Dark chocolate, Dark chocolate — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 25 grams dark chocolate.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Dark chocolate ×1 (25 g) 138 cal · 1.3g P · 15g C · 8.1g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:44:12.827Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 2 cups air-popped popcorn." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Air-popped popcorn — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Air-popped popcorn — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 2 cups air popped popcorn.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Air-popped popcorn ×1 (2 cup) 62 cal · 2.1g P · 12.5g C · 0.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:44:24.129Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 1.25 cups low fat kefir." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Kefir — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Kefir — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1.25 cups low fat kefir.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Kefir ×1 (1.25 cup) 126 cal · 10.1g P · 13.8g C · 3.1g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:44:47.394Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 4 ounces tempeh." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Tempeh — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Tempeh — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 4 ounces tempeh.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Tempeh ×1 (4 oz) 218 cal · 23g P · 8.6g C · 12.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:44:58.846Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add 1 cup canned corn drained." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Sweet corn? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:45:15.363Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I had 70 grams turkey pepperoni." (difficulty —)1.8s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): APPLEGATE NATURALS* Uncured Turkey Pepperoni — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): APPLEGATE NATURALS* Uncured Turkey Pepperoni — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.8s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I logged APPLEGATE NATURALS Uncured Turkey Pepperoni (70 grams (70 g)) — let me know if that's not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: APPLEGATE NATURALS* Uncured Turkey Pepperoni ×1 (70 grams (70 g)) 187 cal · 23.3g P · 0g C · 9.3g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:45:28.278Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from a manually curated nutrition entry.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 3 cups spinach cooked down." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Spinach — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Spinach — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 3 cups spinach cooked down.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Spinach ×1 (3 cup) 21 cal · 2.6g P · 3.2g C · 0.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:45:39.561Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 2 rice cakes with 1 tablespoon almond butter." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Almond butter, Plain rice cakes — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Almond butter, Plain rice cakes — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 2 rice cakes and 1 tablespoon almond butter.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Plain rice cakes ×1 (2 rice cakes) 70 cal · 1.4g P · 14.7g C · 0.5g F
created food_log_entry: Almond butter ×1 (1 tbsp) 98 cal · 3.4g P · 3g C · 9g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:45:51.196Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 120 grams grilled zucchini." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Zucchini — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Zucchini — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 120 grams grilled zucchini.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Zucchini ×1 (120 g) 20 cal · 1.4g P · 3.7g C · 0.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:46:02.497Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add 1 cup beef chili." (difficulty —)1.6s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.6s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I couldn't find Add 1 Packaged Food in my nutrition database, so I haven't logged it — I'd only be guessing the nutrition. Say the exact name on the package, or tell me to log a generic packaged food.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:46:15.579Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I ate 4 ounces turkey meatballs." (difficulty —)0.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Turkey meatballs — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Turkey meatballs — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 4 ounces turkey meatballs.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Turkey meatballs ×1 (4 oz) 210 cal · 20.4g P · 6.8g C · 11.3g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:46:26.847Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 125 grams mango." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Mango — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Mango — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 125 grams mango.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Mango ×1 (125 g) 75 cal · 1g P · 18.8g C · 0.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:46:38.171Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log one cup split pea soup." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown How much of the one cup split pea soup should I log — half, or a different share? I did not log it yet because a split portion needs a quantity.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:46:52.019Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 3 ounces goat cheese." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Goat cheese — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Goat cheese — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 3 ounces goat cheese.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Goat cheese ×1 (3 oz) 310 cal · 18.4g P · 0.1g C · 25.3g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:47:03.317Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add 2 cups watermelon cubes." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Watermelon — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Watermelon — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 2 cups watermelon cubes.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Watermelon ×1 (2 cup) 91 cal · 1.8g P · 23.1g C · 0.6g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:47:14.600Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I had 1 cup cooked couscous." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for 1 cup cooked couscous? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:47:28.466Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track 6 ounces tilapia with lemon, no oil." (difficulty —)0.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: Reported could-not-confirm (write-confirmation false negative).

Why verdict Reported could-not-confirm (write-confirmation false negative).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I wasn't sure which food you meant to correct. Could you try again with a bit more detail?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:47:39.681Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 75 grams sour cream." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Sour cream — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Sour cream — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 75 grams sour cream.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Sour cream ×1 (75 g) 147 cal · 2.3g P · 4.2g C · 13.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:47:50.983Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 1 cup roasted Brussels sprouts." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Brussels sprouts — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Brussels sprouts — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup roasted brussels sprouts.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Brussels sprouts ×1 (1 cup) 70 cal · 5.4g P · 14.4g C · 0.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:48:02.249Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add half cup ricotta." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Ricotta cheese — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Ricotta cheese — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged half cup ricotta. Assumed 0.5 cup as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Ricotta cheese ×1 (0.5 cup) 182 cal · 11.8g P · 7.4g C · 11.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:48:13.532Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I ate 95 grams grapes." (difficulty —)0.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Grapes — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Grapes — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 95 grams grapes.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Grapes ×1 (95 g) 66 cal · 0.7g P · 17.2g C · 0.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:48:24.815Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 4 ounces seitan." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Seitan — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Seitan — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 4 ounces seitan.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Seitan ×1 (4 oz) 160 cal · 28g P · 6.7g C · 2.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:48:36.100Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 2 cups minestrone soup." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Minestrone soup — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Minestrone soup — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 2 cups minestrone soup.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Minestrone soup ×1 (2 cup) 191 cal · 8.8g P · 27.4g C · 5.4g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:49:02.999Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Record 45 grams pita chips." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "45 grams pita chips" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Potato Chips)

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "45 grams pita chips" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Potato Chips)

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Potato Chips (45 grams (45 g)) — the macros are an estimate since this food varies by brand.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Potato Chips ×1 (45 grams (45 g)) 241 cal · 3.2g P · 23.9g C · 15.8g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:49:14.398Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from user default.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add 1 large kiwi." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Kiwi — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Kiwi — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 large kiwi.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Kiwi ×1 (1 kiwi) 42 cal · 0.8g P · 10.1g C · 0.3g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:49:25.700Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I had 3 ounces ham." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Ham — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Ham — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 3 ounces ham.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Ham ×1 (3 oz) 123 cal · 17.9g P · 1.3g C · 4.7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:49:37.032Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 1 cup egg whites." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Egg whites — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Egg whites — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup egg whites.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Egg whites ×1 (1 cup) 126 cal · 26.5g P · 1.7g C · 0.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:49:49.016Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log 35 grams sunflower seeds." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Sunflower seeds — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Sunflower seeds — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 35 grams sunflower seeds.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Sunflower seeds ×1 (35 g) 204 cal · 7.3g P · 7g C · 18g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:50:00.301Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record 2 cups cauliflower rice." (difficulty —)0.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): MANN'S Cauliflower "Rice" — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): MANN'S Cauliflower "Rice" — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged MANN'S Cauliflower "Rice" (2 cups (316 g)).

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: MANN'S Cauliflower "Rice" ×1 (2 cups (316 g)) 76 cal · 7.4g P · 14.9g C · 0g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:50:11.915Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from a manually curated nutrition entry.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add 5 ounces lamb chop, cooked weight." (difficulty —)3.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 3.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I need to resolve cooked weight before I log this meal. What should I use for cooked weight?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:50:26.199Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I ate 110 grams pineapple." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Pineapple — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Pineapple — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 110 grams pineapple.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Pineapple ×1 (110 g) 55 cal · 0.6g P · 14.4g C · 0.1g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:50:37.484Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Track 1 cup baked beans." (difficulty —)0.2s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Baked beans — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Baked beans — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.2s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup baked beans.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Baked beans ×1 (1 cup) 273 cal · 11.7g P · 56.2g C · 2.3g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:50:48.818Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log a Chobani Zero Sugar vanilla cup." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I couldn't find Chobani Zero Sugar Vanilla Yogurt Cup in my nutrition database, so I haven't logged it — I'd only be guessing the nutrition. Say the exact name on the package, or tell me to log a generic yogurt.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:51:00.499Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I had a Quest chocolate chip cookie dough protein bar." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Quest chocolate chip cookie dough bar — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Quest chocolate chip cookie dough bar — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Quest chocolate chip cookie dough bar — the macros are an estimate since this food varies by brand.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Quest chocolate chip cookie dough bar ×1 (one) 190 cal · 21g P · 22g C · 9g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:51:12.200Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from open food facts.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Record one Fairlife Core Power 26 gram vanilla shake." (difficulty —)2.0s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 15 kcal is implausibly LOW for 1 count of Fairlife Core Power Elite Vanilla Protein Shake (typical 160-250 kcal [per-serving])

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 15 kcal is implausibly LOW for 1 count of Fairlife Core Power Elite Vanilla Protein Shake (typical 160-250 kcal [per-serving])

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.0s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Fairlife Core Power Elite Vanilla Protein Shake (26 gram (26 g)) — the macros are an estimate since this food varies by brand.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Fairlife Core Power Elite Vanilla Protein Shake ×1 (26 gram (26 g)) 15 cal · 2.6g P · 0.5g C · 0.2g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:51:25.399Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from a manually curated nutrition entry.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Starbucks grande flat white with whole milk." (difficulty —)5.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Whole milk? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:51:45.403Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track a Chipotle chicken bowl: white rice, black beans, mild salsa, cheese, lettuce." (difficulty —)2.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Which cheese should I use?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:51:55.683Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log a McDonalds Egg McMuffin." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Egg? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:52:12.933Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I ate a Taco Bell bean burrito." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a taco bell bean burrito? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:52:27.218Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record one RXBAR blueberry protein bar." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): RXBAR Blueberry Protein Bar — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): RXBAR Blueberry Protein Bar — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged RXBAR Blueberry Protein Bar — the macros are an estimate since this food varies by brand.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: RXBAR Blueberry Protein Bar ×1 (1 bar) 210 cal · 12g P · 24g C · 8g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:52:38.400Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from a manually curated nutrition entry.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Premier Protein caramel shake." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a premier protein caramel shake? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:52:52.218Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track one Dave’s Killer Bread thin-sliced Good Seed slice." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Was it plain, or did you have anything on it like butter or cream cheese? I did not log it yet because add-ons can change the nutrition.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:53:08.781Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log a Siggi’s strawberry skyr cup." (difficulty —)1.0s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.0s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I couldn't find Siggi S Strawberry Skyr Packaged Food in my nutrition database, so I haven't logged it — I'd only be guessing the nutrition. Say the exact name on the package, or tell me to log a generic packaged food.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:53:38.164Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I had a Panera Fuji apple salad with chicken, full size." (difficulty —)1.9s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.9s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Which full size should I use?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:53:51.281Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Record one Celsius peach vibe can." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Peach? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:54:07.867Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Kodiak Cakes protein waffle, one waffle." (difficulty —)2.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "Kodiak Cakes protein waffle" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Birthday Cake Power Waffles With Sprinkles, Waffle, Plain)

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "Kodiak Cakes protein waffle" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Birthday Cake Power Waffles With Sprinkles, Waffle, Plain)

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Birthday Cake Power Waffles With Sprinkles — KODIAK and Waffle, Plain. Assumed Birthday Cake Power Waffles With Sprinkles — KODIAK for "a Kodiak Cakes protein waffle" (best matching option). Tell me if that is wrong. Tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Birthday Cake Power Waffles With Sprinkles ×1 (1 waffle) 230 cal · 10g P · 27g C · 9g F
created food_log_entry: Waffle, Plain ×1 (1 small waffle) 149 cal · 3.5g P · 16.6g C · 7.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:54:21.116Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the USDA nutrition database.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track a Subway six inch turkey on wheat with provolone." (difficulty —)3.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 3.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a subway six inch turkey on wheat with provolone? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:54:35.314Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log one KIND dark chocolate nuts and sea salt bar." (difficulty —)0.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "KIND dark chocolate nuts" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Dark chocolate, No Cow Chocolate Sea Salt Bar)

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "KIND dark chocolate nuts" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Dark chocolate, No Cow Chocolate Sea Salt Bar)

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Dark chocolate and No Cow Chocolate Sea Salt Bar — No Cow. Assumed catalog default servings where you did not say an amount — tell me if that is not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Dark chocolate ×1 (100 g) 550 cal · 5.1g P · 60g C · 32.2g F
created food_log_entry: No Cow Chocolate Sea Salt Bar ×1 (1 bar (60 g)) 210 cal · 20g P · 23g C · 7g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:54:46.868Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I ate a Trader Joe’s chicken tikka masala frozen meal." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Chicken breast? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:55:03.432Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record one Oikos Triple Zero mixed berry yogurt." (difficulty —)0.9s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Mixed Berry Flavor Triple Zero Blended Greek Nonfat Yogurt — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Mixed Berry Flavor Triple Zero Blended Greek Nonfat Yogurt — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.9s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I logged Mixed Berry Flavor Triple Zero Blended Greek Nonfat Yogurt — OIKOS — let me know if that's not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Mixed Berry Flavor Triple Zero Blended Greek Nonfat Yogurt ×1 (1 cup) 101 cal · 15g P · 10.1g C · 0g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:55:15.486Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the USDA nutrition database.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Wendy’s small chili." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a wendys small chili? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:55:29.317Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track one Clif Builder chocolate mint bar." (difficulty —)3.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 3.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Which one did you mean? 1. Builder'S Protein Chocolate Mint Bar — Clif Bar and Company, 2. Clif, Builder'S, Max Protein Bar, Mint Chocolate Chip — Clif Bar and Company

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:55:43.548Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log a Sweetgreen harvest bowl." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a sweetgreen harvest bowl? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:55:57.368Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I had one Larabar apple pie bar." (difficulty —)0.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 198 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 1 count of Apple Pie Fruit & Nut Bar (typical 60-130 kcal [per-serving])

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 198 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 1 count of Apple Pie Fruit & Nut Bar (typical 60-130 kcal [per-serving])

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Apple Pie Fruit & Nut Bar — Larabar — the macros are an estimate since this food varies by brand.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Apple Pie Fruit & Nut Bar ×1 (1 bar (45 g)) 198 cal · 4.1g P · 24.8g C · 9.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:56:08.917Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from user default.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Record a Dunkin medium iced coffee: cream plus sugar." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a dunkin medium iced coffee cream plus sugar? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:56:22.749Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Kirkland protein bar chocolate brownie." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Generic protein bar? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:56:39.913Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track a Five Guys little cheeseburger." (difficulty —)3.0s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 3.0s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a five guys little cheeseburger? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:56:53.570Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log one Blue Diamond 100 calorie almond pack." (difficulty —)6.0s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 6.0s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Almonds? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:57:10.532Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I ate a Lean Cuisine herb roasted chicken meal." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Chicken breast? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:57:27.082Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Record one Gatorade Zero 20 ounce bottle." (difficulty —)1.8s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "Gatorade Zero 20 ounce bottle" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Gatorade Lemon Lime Thirst Quencher (8-20 Fluid Ounce) 160 Fluid Ounce 8 Pack Plastic Bottles)

Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG item/product identity "Gatorade Zero 20 ounce bottle" — saved row does not hit product alias (rows: Gatorade Lemon Lime Thirst Quencher (8-20 Fluid Ounce) 160 Fluid Ounce 8 Pack Plastic Bottles)

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.8s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I logged Gatorade Lemon Lime Thirst Quencher (8-20 Fluid Ounce) 160 Fluid Ounce 8 Pack Plastic Bottles (20 ounce (567 g)) — let me know if that's not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Gatorade Lemon Lime Thirst Quencher (8-20 Fluid Ounce) 160 Fluid Ounce 8 Pack Plastic Bottles ×1 (20 ounce (567 g)) 130 cal · 0g P · 34.6g C · 0g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:57:40.067Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the USDA nutrition database.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Shake Shack single ShackBurger." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a shake shack single shackburger? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:57:53.901Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track a Noosa lemon yogurt 8 ounce tub." (difficulty —)6.1s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 6.1s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Plain Greek yogurt? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:58:11.151Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log a Costco rotisserie chicken breast serving, 6 ounces." (difficulty —)6.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 6.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Which one did you mean? 1. Grilled Chicken Breast, 2. Chicken breast (50 g), 3. Grilled Chicken Breast (6 oz), 4. Grilled Chicken Breast (4 oz)

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:58:43.717Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"I had a Jimmy Johns turkey tom unwich." (difficulty —)2.9s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Jimmy John's #4 Turkey Tom, Unwich — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Jimmy John's #4 Turkey Tom, Unwich — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.9s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I logged Jimmy John's #4 Turkey Tom, Unwich — let me know if that's not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Jimmy John's #4 Turkey Tom, Unwich ×1 (a) 250 cal · 15g P · 5g C · 17g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:58:57.932Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from user default.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record one Orgain creamy chocolate protein shake." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): ORGAIN Organic Protein Shake, Creamy Chocolate — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): ORGAIN Organic Protein Shake, Creamy Chocolate — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged ORGAIN Organic Protein Shake, Creamy Chocolate — the macros are an estimate since this food varies by brand.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: ORGAIN Organic Protein Shake, Creamy Chocolate ×1 (1 orgain creamy chocolate protein shake) 149 cal · 26.1g P · 14.1g C · 4.1g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:59:09.719Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from user default.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Nature Valley oats and honey two-bar pack." (difficulty —)2.9s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.9s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I need to resolve honey two-bar pack before I log this meal. What should I use for honey two-bar pack?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:59:23.716Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track a Whole Foods salmon avocado roll." (difficulty —)5.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Avocado? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:59:40.663Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log one PopCorners sea salt snack bag." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for one popcorners sea salt snack bag? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T19:59:54.068Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"I ate a Chick-fil-A grilled chicken sandwich." (difficulty —)2.7s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.7s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for a chick fil a grilled chicken sandwich? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:00:08.276Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record a Muscle Milk chocolate 14 ounce bottle." (difficulty —)3.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Chocolate (4 - 10 Fluid Ounce) 40 Fluid Ounce 4 Pack Plastic Bottles — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Chocolate (4 - 10 Fluid Ounce) 40 Fluid Ounce 4 Pack Plastic Bottles — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 3.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I logged Chocolate (4 - 10 Fluid Ounce) 40 Fluid Ounce 4 Pack Plastic Bottles — MUSCLE MILK (14 ounce (427 g)) — let me know if that's not right.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Chocolate (4 - 10 Fluid Ounce) 40 Fluid Ounce 4 Pack Plastic Bottles ×1 (14 ounce (427 g)) 243 cal · 25.6g P · 11.4g C · 9.9g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:00:22.316Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the USDA nutrition database.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Add a Banza chickpea pasta serving, 2 ounces dry." (difficulty —)1.3s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.3s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I need to resolve 2 ounces dry before I log this meal. What should I use for 2 ounces dry?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:00:34.784Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track one Halo Top vanilla bean pint, half the pint." (difficulty —)3.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 3.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown I need to resolve half the pint before I log this meal. What should I use for half the pint?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:00:49.319Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Log my turkey sandwich: two slices rye, 4 ounces turkey, one slice Swiss, mustard." (difficulty —)1.6s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 1.6s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What should I use for two slices rye?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:01:02.084Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Dinner bowl: 150 grams rice, 120 grams chicken, 80 grams avocado, salsa, 30 grams cheese." (difficulty —)5.8s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: Reported could-not-confirm (write-confirmation false negative).

Why verdict Reported could-not-confirm (write-confirmation false negative).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 5.8s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What would you like me to do with that?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:01:19.067Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Add homemade smoothie: banana, 1 cup whole milk, 30 grams peanut butter, and a scoop whey." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Homemade Smoothie, Banana, Whey protein powder, Peanut butter, Whole milk — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Homemade Smoothie, Banana, Whey protein powder, Peanut butter, Whole milk — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Homemade Smoothie. Includes one banana, 1 cup whole milk, 30 grams peanut butter, and a scoop whey.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Homemade Smoothie ×1 (serving) 540 cal · 41.5g P · 45.7g C · 24.1g F
created food_log_entry: Banana ×1 (1 banana) 105 cal · 1.3g P · 27.1g C · 0.4g F
created food_log_entry: Whole milk ×1 (1 cup) 149 cal · 7.8g P · 11.7g C · 8.1g F
created food_log_entry: Peanut butter ×1 (30 g) 176 cal · 7.5g P · 5.9g C · 15.1g F
created food_log_entry: Whey protein powder ×1 (1 scoop) 110 cal · 24.9g P · 1g C · 0.5g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:01:30.735Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from a manually curated nutrition entry.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Record my omelet: 2 eggs, 50 grams mushrooms, 30 grams feta, spinach." (difficulty —)0.5s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Omelet, Feta cheese, Mushrooms, Egg, Spinach — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Omelet, Feta cheese, Mushrooms, Egg, Spinach — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.5s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Omelet. Includes 2 eggs, 50 grams mushrooms, 30 grams feta, and Spinach.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Omelet ×1 (serving) 240 cal · 19.4g P · 4.7g C · 16.2g F
created food_log_entry: Egg ×1 (2 eggs) 143 cal · 12.6g P · 0.7g C · 9.5g F
created food_log_entry: Mushrooms ×1 (50 g) 11 cal · 1.6g P · 1.7g C · 0.2g F
created food_log_entry: Feta cheese ×1 (30 g) 79 cal · 4.3g P · 1.2g C · 6.4g F
created food_log_entry: Spinach ×1 (30 g) 7 cal · 0.9g P · 1.1g C · 0.1g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:01:42.418Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from a manually curated nutrition entry.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

FAILshould log the food"Track tacos: three corn tortillas, 5 ounces carne asada, onions, cilantro, and salsa verde." (difficulty —)2.4s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 2.4s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown What should I use for 5 ounces carne asada?

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:01:55.917Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

PASSshould log the food"Log salad: 4 cups arugula, 120 grams grilled shrimp, 20 grams walnuts, balsamic." (difficulty —)0.6s

Verdict Expected LOG — should log the food. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Walnuts, Salad, Shrimp, Balsamic vinegar, Arugula — card not captured.

Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Walnuts, Salad, Shrimp, Balsamic vinegar, Arugula — card not captured.

My override

Things I think are wrong

Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.

Comprehension

Picked wrong food Wrong quantity Should have asked (over-logged) Shouldn't have asked (over-asked) Wrong action entirely

Execution

Didn't save to DB Wrong data saved No voice/TTS Card missing/wrong No chat

Cosmetic

Wording weird

Other thing wrong (describe below)

Things the report marked wrong but I think are right

Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.

Actually right

Food/action was right Quantity/serving was right Asking was right Not asking was right Answer was right No app data row was expected App data row was right Voice/card/chat was acceptable

Report/grader issue

Report expected the wrong result Evidence was enough to judge Failure reason was not valid

Other thing actually right (describe below)

Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.

Timing 0.6s

1 · TTS said no speech captured

2 · Card shown Logged Salad. Includes 4 cups arugula, 120 grams grilled shrimp, 20 grams walnuts, and Balsamic vinegar.

3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Salad ×1 (serving) 284 cal · 34g P · 8.6g C · 14g F
created food_log_entry: Arugula ×1 (4 cup) 20 cal · 2.1g P · 3g C · 0.6g F
created food_log_entry: Shrimp ×1 (120 g) 119 cal · 28.8g P · 0.2g C · 0.4g F
created food_log_entry: Walnuts ×1 (20 g) 131 cal · 3g P · 2.7g C · 13g F
created food_log_entry: Balsamic vinegar ×1 (16 g) 14 cal · 0.1g P · 2.7g C · 0g F

4 · UI did no screen events captured

5 · Seed/context data

Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.

No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.

snapshot captured 2026-07-30T20:02:07.618Z

6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.

7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from a manually curated nutrition entry.

8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)

Why the fails happened — comprehension vs execution vs cosmetic

Handled correctly? — by expected action

Accuracy by difficulty

Clarification follow-ups — scored separately

Cosmetic only

System / infra

Latency

Filter — controls the list below

Per-utterance detail