📊 Status Dashboard ↑ all runs

food-corpus-b-FROZEN-20260712-fb954a4d-c43-20260801

food-corpus-b-FROZEN-20260712 · preserved partial run · 573s elapsed · iOS sim
This is the preserved partial result for this run. Its original utterance evidence is shown below.
Rows
42
Pass
33 (79%)
Fail
9 (21%)
Unverified
0 (0%)
Pass rate
79%
Avg difficulty
—
"Unverified" = the grader couldn't confidently call it PASS or FAIL from the trace — needs a human look (that's you 👍/👎-ing it). "Pass rate" = pass ÷ (pass + fail) — it excludes Unverified rows, so it differs slightly from the Pass % above (which is share of ALL rows).

Why the fails happened — comprehension vs execution vs cosmetic

Comprehension — picked the wrong action/target (the hard problem)
9 (100%)
Of 9 fails: if most are comprehension, that's the hard problem (the app didn't figure out the right action/target); execution/cosmetic means the decision was right but something downstream broke. Click a bar for the sub-split + example utterances.

Handled correctly? — by expected action

Click a row to see the ones it got wrong; click a wrong utterance to jump to its full detail below.
Supposed toNCorrectWrongUnverified
▸ LOG — log the entry 4233 (79%) 9 (21%) 0 (0%)
Total4233 (79%)90

Accuracy by difficulty

Pending A1's per-utterance difficulty score (requested 2026-07-05) — this bar chart lights up once that lands.

Clarification follow-ups — scored separately

Second turn: app asked, we replied — did it resolve correctly?
No CLARIFY_ANSWER (follow-up) rows in this run.

Cosmetic only

Not yet classified — pending A1 adding cosmetic-issue detection (double response, wording variance, rounding) to the grader. Nothing fabricated here.

System / infra

Not yet classified — pending confirmation from A1 whether trace data already carries infra-error signal (TTS/sync/DB-write errors) or needs new detection.

Latency

Avg (time to ready)
0.8s
p90
2.0s
Max
8.4s
Went async
0 (0%)
Each dot is one utterance (green=pass, red=fail, amber=unverified), positioned by how long it took to be ready for review. Bigger dots are the slow outliers — click any dot to jump to its detail.
0s
1s
2s
5s
9s
Response path — quick (single response) vs async (an ack like "Working on it…" before the real answer).
Quick response
42
Slowest 8 utterances (click to jump to detail):
"Dinner was 5 ounces cod plus 160 grams roasted potatoes."8.4s
"Add 140 grams sweet potato mash."5.4s
"Add one large navel orange."5.4s
"Breakfast was 45 grams dry rolled oats cooked with water."2.7s
"Add 12 baby carrots and 2 tablespoons hummus."2.1s
"Track a 9 ounce baked potato, plain."2.0s
"Record 100 grams cooked pasta with 125 grams marinara."1.0s
"Track 7 ounces rotisserie chicken, meat only."0.7s

Filter — controls the list below

Pass / Fail / Unverified
PASS 33 FAIL 9 UNVERIFIED 0
Module (intended for)
Food (42)
Utterance sub-type (within module)
42 shown — 33 pass, 9 fail, 0 unverified

Per-utterance detail

PASSshould log the entry"Log 170 grams plain nonfat Greek yogurt." (difficulty —)0.3s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Nonfat Greek yogurt, Nonfat Greek yogurt — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Nonfat Greek yogurt, Nonfat Greek yogurt — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.3s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 170 grams plain nonfat greek yogurt.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Nonfat Greek yogurt ×1 (170 g) 100 cal · 17.5g P · 6.1g C · 0.7g F
created food_log_entry: Nonfat Greek yogurt ×1 (170 g) 100 cal · 17.5g P · 6.1g C · 0.7g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:17:53.094Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"I ate 2 slices sourdough toast with 14 grams butter." (difficulty —)0.4s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 530 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 2 count of Toast (typical 160-260 kcal [per-serving])
Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — IMPLAUSIBLE: 530 kcal is implausibly HIGH for 2 count of Toast (typical 160-260 kcal [per-serving])
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.4s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged Toast and 14 grams butter. Assumed catalog default servings where you did not say an amount — tell me if that is not right.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Toast ×2 (100 g) 530 cal · 18g P · 98g C · 6.4g F
created food_log_entry: Butter ×1 (14 g) 100 cal · 0.1g P · 0g C · 11.4g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:18:04.646Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Record 3.5 ounces roasted turkey breast." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Turkey breast — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Turkey breast — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 3.5 ounces roasted turkey breast.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Turkey breast ×1 (3.5 oz) 134 cal · 28.8g P · 0g C · 1.7g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:18:15.991Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Breakfast was 45 grams dry rolled oats cooked with water." (difficulty —)2.7s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 2.7s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Dry oats? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.
3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:18:29.818Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Add one large navel orange." (difficulty —)5.4s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 5.4s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Orange? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.
3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:18:46.346Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Track 220 grams cooked jasmine rice." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked jasmine rice — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked jasmine rice — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 220 grams cooked jasmine rice.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cooked jasmine rice ×1 (220 g) 286 cal · 5.3g P · 62g C · 0.7g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:18:57.667Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"For lunch I had 6 ounces grilled flank steak." (difficulty —)0.4s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Grilled Steak — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Grilled Steak — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.4s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged Grilled Steak. Using your recent Grilled Steak history. Tell me if that is wrong.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Grilled Steak ×1 (ounce) 340 cal · 42g P · 0g C · 18g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:19:09.161Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from user default.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Put down 85 grams avocado." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Avocado — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Avocado — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 85 grams avocado.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Avocado ×1 (85 g) 136 cal · 1.7g P · 7.2g C · 12.5g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:19:20.458Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"I had a cup and a half of cooked lentils." (difficulty —)0.4s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Lentils — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Lentils — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.4s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged Lentils. Assumed catalog default servings where you did not say an amount — tell me if that is not right.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Lentils ×1 (100 g) 116 cal · 9g P · 20.1g C · 0.4g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:19:32.161Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Record 28 grams cheddar cheese." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cheddar cheese — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cheddar cheese — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 28 grams cheddar cheese.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cheddar cheese ×1 (28 g) 113 cal · 6.4g P · 1g C · 9.3g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:19:43.427Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Add 12 baby carrots and 2 tablespoons hummus." (difficulty —)2.1s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Baby carrots, Hummus, Plain — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Baby carrots, Hummus, Plain — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 2.1s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 12 baby carrots and Hummus, Plain.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Baby carrots ×1 (12 baby carrots) 42 cal · 0.7g P · 9.8g C · 0.1g F
created food_log_entry: Hummus, Plain ×1 (2 tablespoons (30 g)) 73 cal · 2.2g P · 4.5g C · 5.1g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:19:56.612Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Track a 9 ounce baked potato, plain." (difficulty —)2.0s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 2.0s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown I need to resolve plain before I log this meal. What should I use for plain?
3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:20:09.779Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Dinner was 5 ounces cod plus 160 grams roasted potatoes." (difficulty —)8.4s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 8.4s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Cod? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.
3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:20:29.420Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Log one cup cooked quinoa." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked quinoa — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked quinoa — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged one cup cooked quinoa. Assumed 1 cup as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cooked quinoa ×1 (1 cup) 222 cal · 8.1g P · 39.4g C · 3.5g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:20:40.762Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Add 2 cups romaine and 30 grams parmesan." (difficulty —)0.3s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Romaine lettuce, Parmesan cheese — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Romaine lettuce, Parmesan cheese — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.3s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 2 cups romaine and 30 grams parmesan.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Romaine lettuce ×1 (2 cup) 16 cal · 1.1g P · 3.1g C · 0.3g F
created food_log_entry: Parmesan cheese ×1 (30 g) 124 cal · 9g P · 2.5g C · 8.6g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:20:52.091Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"I ate 150 grams blueberries." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Blueberries — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Blueberries — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 150 grams blueberries.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Blueberries ×1 (150 g) 86 cal · 1g P · 21.8g C · 0.5g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:21:03.390Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Record three scrambled eggs cooked with a teaspoon olive oil." (difficulty —)0.5s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Olive oil, Egg — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Olive oil, Egg — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.5s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged three scrambled eggs cooked and a teaspoon olive oil. Assumed 1 tsp as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Egg ×1 (3 eggs) 215 cal · 18.9g P · 1g C · 14.3g F
created food_log_entry: Olive oil ×1 (1 tsp) 40 cal · 0g P · 0g C · 4.5g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:21:15.059Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Track 7 ounces rotisserie chicken, meat only." (difficulty —)0.7s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "7 ounces rotisserie chicken meat only" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted, Chicken breast)
Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "7 ounces rotisserie chicken meat only" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted, Chicken breast)
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.7s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged Chicken breast and Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted. Assumed a typical serving of Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted while logging the rest of this meal. Tell me if that is not right.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Chicken breast ×1 (7 ounces (198.4 g)) 327 cal · 61.5g P · 0g C · 7.1g F
created food_log_entry: Pork, Cured, Ham with Natural Juices, Spiral Slice, Meat Only, Boneless, Separable Lean Only, Heated, Roasted ×1 (3 serving) 107 cal · 19.2g P · 0.9g C · 3.2g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:21:26.862Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Snack was 32 grams almonds." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Almonds — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Almonds — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 32 grams almonds.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Almonds ×1 (32 g) 185 cal · 6.8g P · 6.9g C · 16g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:21:38.279Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Log 250 milliliters whole milk." (difficulty —)0.1s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.1s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown I couldn't convert 250 milliliters of Whole milk from the serving information I found. What does the label say for grams or calories? I did not log it yet.
3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:21:49.499Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"I had 1 tablespoon peanut butter on a medium banana." (difficulty —)0.4s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Banana, Peanut butter — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Banana, Peanut butter — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.4s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 1 tablespoon peanut butter and a medium banana. Assumed 1 medium banana as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Peanut butter ×1 (1 tbsp) 88 cal · 3.8g P · 2.9g C · 7.6g F
created food_log_entry: Banana ×1 (1 medium banana) 105 cal · 1.3g P · 27.1g C · 0.4g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:22:12.638Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Record 100 grams cooked pasta with 125 grams marinara." (difficulty —)1.0s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
Why verdict OVER-ASK — asked instead of logging (no saved row).
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 1.0s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown I found Cooked pasta, but I also heard 125 marinara. Should I log those separately too?
3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:22:24.811Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Add 4 ounces tofu and 2 cups broccoli." (difficulty —)0.3s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Broccoli, Firm tofu — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Broccoli, Firm tofu — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.3s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 4 ounces tofu and 2 cups broccoli.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Firm tofu ×1 (4 oz) 163 cal · 19.3g P · 3.2g C · 9.9g F
created food_log_entry: Broccoli ×1 (2 cup) 64 cal · 4.4g P · 13.1g C · 0.7g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:22:36.202Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Track 1 cup black beans drained." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Black beans — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Black beans — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup black beans drained.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Black beans ×1 (1 cup) 227 cal · 15.3g P · 40.8g C · 0.9g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:22:47.508Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Put down 60 grams granola." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Granola — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Granola — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 60 grams granola.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Granola ×1 (60 g) 283 cal · 6g P · 38.4g C · 12g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:22:58.914Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"I ate 180 grams cottage cheese." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cottage cheese — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cottage cheese — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 180 grams cottage cheese.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cottage cheese ×1 (180 g) 176 cal · 20g P · 6.1g C · 7.7g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:23:10.299Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Log one medium pear and 18 grams walnuts." (difficulty —)0.3s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Pear, Walnuts — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Pear, Walnuts — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.3s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged one medium pear and 18 grams walnuts. Assumed 1 pear as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Pear ×1 (1 pear) 101 cal · 0.7g P · 27.1g C · 0.2g F
created food_log_entry: Walnuts ×1 (18 g) 118 cal · 2.7g P · 2.5g C · 11.7g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:23:21.686Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Record 2 ounces smoked salmon." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Smoked salmon — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Smoked salmon — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 2 ounces smoked salmon.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Smoked salmon ×1 (2 oz) 66 cal · 10.4g P · 0g C · 2.4g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:23:32.922Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Add 1 cup cooked farro." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked farro — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cooked farro — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup cooked farro.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cooked farro ×1 (1 cup) 240 cal · 8.6g P · 50.7g C · 1.6g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:23:44.227Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Track 90 grams cucumber and 90 grams tomato." (difficulty —)0.3s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Cucumber, Tomato — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Cucumber, Tomato — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.3s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 90 grams cucumber and 90 grams tomato.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Cucumber ×1 (90 g) 14 cal · 0.6g P · 3.2g C · 0.1g F
created food_log_entry: Tomato ×1 (90 g) 16 cal · 0.8g P · 3.5g C · 0.2g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:23:55.608Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Log 6 ounces pork tenderloin." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Pork tenderloin — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Pork tenderloin — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 6 ounces pork tenderloin.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Pork tenderloin ×1 (6 oz) 243 cal · 44.2g P · 0g C · 6g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:24:06.995Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Record 1 cup edamame shelled." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Edamame — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Edamame — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup edamame shelled.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Edamame ×1 (1 cup) 188 cal · 18.4g P · 13.8g C · 8.1g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:24:18.326Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Add a small flour tortilla with 50 grams grilled chicken." (difficulty —)0.6s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Flour tortilla, Chicken breast — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Flour tortilla, Chicken breast — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.6s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged a small flour tortilla and 50 grams grilled chicken. Assumed 1 small flour tortilla as the default serving. Tell me if you want a different amount. Tell me if that is not right.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Flour tortilla ×1 (1 small flour tortilla) 74 cal · 2g P · 12g C · 1.9g F
created food_log_entry: Chicken breast ×1 (50 g) 83 cal · 15.5g P · 0g C · 1.8g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:24:30.008Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"I had 40 grams raisins." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Raisins — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Raisins — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 40 grams raisins.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Raisins ×1 (40 g) 120 cal · 1.2g P · 31.7g C · 0.2g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:24:41.360Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Track 2 tablespoons chia seeds." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Chia seeds — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Chia seeds — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 2 tablespoons chia seeds.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Chia seeds ×1 (2 tbsp) 102 cal · 3.5g P · 8.8g C · 6.4g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:24:52.677Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Log 5 ounces shrimp cooked." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Shrimp — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Shrimp — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 5 ounces shrimp cooked.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Shrimp ×1 (5 oz) 140 cal · 34g P · 0.3g C · 0.4g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:25:04.134Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Record 1 cup unsweetened applesauce." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Unsweetened applesauce — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Unsweetened applesauce — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 1 cup unsweetened applesauce.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Unsweetened applesauce ×1 (1 cup) 102 cal · 0.5g P · 27.6g C · 0.2g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:25:15.417Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
FAILshould log the entry"Add 140 grams sweet potato mash." (difficulty —)5.4s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. FAIL: WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "140 grams sweet potato mash" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Turkey Sandwich, Berry Protein Smoothie)
Why verdict WRITE-TRUTH FAIL — WRONG/MISSING item "140 grams sweet potato mash" — no saved row with matching identity (rows: Turkey Sandwich, Berry Protein Smoothie)
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 5.4s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown What exact food and amount should I use for Sweet potato? I did not log it yet because I could not safely finish that food log.
3 · App data rows written No food/workout/list/note data row captured for this utterance.This does not mean "nothing anywhere was stored"; spoken/chat evidence is shown above, and some chat/session records may live outside this write-capture field. It means the report did not capture an app data-row write such as food_log_entries or workout_sets.
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:25:31.980Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method No lookup method was captured for this path.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"I ate 25 grams dark chocolate." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Dark chocolate — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Dark chocolate — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 25 grams dark chocolate.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Dark chocolate ×1 (25 g) 138 cal · 1.3g P · 15g C · 8.1g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:25:43.359Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Track 2 cups air-popped popcorn." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Air-popped popcorn — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Air-popped popcorn — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 2 cups air popped popcorn.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Air-popped popcorn ×1 (2 cup) 62 cal · 2.1g P · 12.5g C · 0.7g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:25:54.664Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Log 1.25 cups low fat kefir." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Kefir — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Kefir — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 1.25 cups low fat kefir.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Kefir ×1 (1.25 cup) 126 cal · 10.1g P · 13.8g C · 3.1g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:26:17.380Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)
PASSshould log the entry"Record 4 ounces tempeh." (difficulty —)0.2s
Verdict Expected LOG — should log the entry. PASS: Logged (write-truth verified): Tempeh — card not captured.
Why verdict Logged (write-truth verified): Tempeh — card not captured.
My override
Things I think are wrong
Use this when the report passed something that should have failed.
Comprehension
Execution
Cosmetic
Things the report marked wrong but I think are right
Use this when the report failed something that should have passed.
Actually right
Report/grader issue
Pick every reason you think applies. Multiple boxes are allowed because one utterance can be wrong in more than one way. Use the note below for "Other" or extra detail.
Timing 0.2s
1 · TTS said no speech captured
2 · Card shown Logged 4 ounces tempeh.
3 · App data rows written created food_log_entry: Tempeh ×1 (4 oz) 218 cal · 23g P · 8.6g C · 12.2g F
4 · UI did no screen events captured
5 · Seed/context data
Seeded starting state: none listed in the corpus row.
  • No DB snapshot captured for this utterance; the report cannot prove whether yesterday/personal data existed.
snapshot captured 2026-08-01T13:26:28.686Z
6 · Why this food No food-decision explanation was captured for this path.
7 · Lookup method The answer used provisional food evidence from the common-food list.
8 · Candidates → decider no candidate list captured (this path did not run DB resolution — e.g. provisional branded log)